Live threats
HighClaude Dispatch Flaw Enables Browser Extension RCE on Host OS BreachBrenner Base Tunnel SE Confirms Data Breach; Extortion Group Claims 812 GB Stolen Rule changeOPM proposes to modify OPM/Central-21 system of records and rename employee survey DeadlineFrench court orders DNS resolver Quad9 to block sites, prompting its withdrawal from France CriticalCritical Android “SMS of Death” Vulnerability (CVE‑2026‑58882) Enables Remote Call Disruption BreachHackers Steal $133 Million from French Bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa via Compromised Service‑Provider Platform Rule changeState Aging Plans guide AgeTech development and privacy practices across U.S. states CriticalCritical OpenSSH Auth Bypass Flaw Lets Long Passwords Circumvent Authentication on Alpine Linux
Updated 06:39 UTC All intelligence →
DAT-03 · Data and Privacy

Deliberate data sharing

Data leaves the organization only through a decided channel, with a defined end and a record of what was shared.

6frameworks fully address it
1partially
1leave it out
SOC 2 ISO 27001 NIST CSF PCI DSS HIPAA GDPR EU AI Act NIST AI RMF
1Where each framework asks for it
  • SOC 2FullCC6.7
  • ISO 27001FullA.5.14
  • NIST CSFFullPR.DS-02
  • PCI DSSFull4.2.1
  • HIPAAFull164.308(b)
  • GDPRFullArt. 28, 44
  • EU AI ActAbsent No general data sharing duty; obligations attach to the AI system and its documentation.
  • NIST AI RMFPartialMAP 4.1 Third-party data flows are mapped.

Build the control once against this objective and cite the clause each auditor asks about. A partial mapping says what the framework leaves out; an absence is a finding about the framework, not a gap in your program.

2What usually proves it

Sharing decision records, data room logs, revocation evidence.

?Why it exists

Most exposure is not a breach; it is sharing nobody ended.

For a smaller organizationA record per share, and a close-out when it ends.